voting rights” and opened public hearing on the matter in late 2018. The stakeholders mostly agreed with the principle. SEC is proposing a draft notification of the Ministry of Finance which reflects

The SEC Civil Sanction Committee (CSC) had earlier resolved to impose civil sanctions on all four offenders of this case, among which only two agreed to comply with the specified civil sanctions

Bangkok, July 3, 2012 ? SEC Secretary-General Vorapol Socatiyanurak revealed after a Q2/2012 meeting with the Association of Thai Securities Companies (ASCO) that the SEC and ASCO agreed on quality

good governance of the invested enterprises are taken into consideration apart from profit making.So far, the 30 institutional investors who have agreed to abide by the I Code include state organizations

penalties under Section 296 of the Act in conjunction with Section 86 of the Criminal Code. Both persons agreed to enter the settlement procedure. The Settlement Committee imposed a respective fine of 500,000

which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine of

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine of 5,659,269 baht on Yongyuth and another 500,000

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and thus liable to penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. As he agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee imposed a

296 of the same Act. As Pantipa agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine on her in the amount of 500,000 baht.

same Act. As Paiboon agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a 6,028,563.75 baht fine on him.Vasant Thienhom, Deputy Secretary-General said, ?In cases where a