. The acts of the 11 persons above, namely GGC former director and executive and their associates, were liable to offenses under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2, in conjunction with Section 89/24, Section
: Determination of Fees for Application for Offer for Sale of Newly Issued Securities and Application for Securitization Project (No. 7) By virtue of Section 14(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
. KorDor. 15/2553 Re: Determination of Fees for Undertaking Business of Licensed Derivatives Exchange By virtue of Section 9(2) of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) which contain certain provisions
offences committed by Bordin and Noparat were liable to violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and Section 83
from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DV Act S.16
), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/04/2014
of First Instance consideration SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 28/11/2024
under an appeal period SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section 244/3 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 28/11/2024