action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the
offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
to disclose IFEC’s default on its bills of exchange, following the SET’s request for clarification on 12 January 2017. Wichai’s actions appear to be intentional causing IFEC to be suspended from
collateral. Furthermore, BAY failed to monitor and oversee the collateral while it was under its care. Such actions constitute a violation of Section 300 in conjunction with Section 46, which is subject to
response, the SEC has taken ongoing actions, focusing on both preventive measures to mitigate potential harm and enforcement actions against misconduct, while working in close coordination with relevant
the facts which should have been disclosed in the factsheets of the company’s corporate bond offering. Such actions are considered acting in the manner that dishonestly deceives the public to obtain
UPDATES 1) IMPACT FROM COVID-19 PANDEMIC, OUR ACTIONS & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES Our actions Social responsibilities and activities through our platforms VGI PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED 2) KEY DEVELOPMENTS IN