(1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/2 and civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the SEA.  The Civil

subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/2, as well as civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA);       (2) Mrs. Teo Lee Ngo

approximately 5.11 million stocks to 7.43 million stocks.The offenses committed by Atthavut and Sujeera were deemed manipulation of TIGER price under Section 244/3 (1) and (2), subject to the penalties under

offense under Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), subject to the penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).By allowing Dr

to 7.43 million stocks. The offenses committed by Atthavut and Sujeera were deemed manipulation of TIGER price under Section 244/3 (1) and (2), subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1

under Section 243 and subject to penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and Section 317/4(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 5) B.E. 2559 (2016) in

) in conjunction with Section 244 (4). All three are liable to the penalties under Sections 296 and 296/2 of the SEA.  The Civil Sanction Committee has resolved to authorize SEC to initiate civil

Bangkok, 9 November 2017 ? The Civil Sanction Committee has imposed civil sanctions on four persons, namely (1) Mr. Surachai Suwanthanakul, (2) Mrs. Orthai Sae-tung, (3) Mr. Somsak Saravutwattanakorn

Civil Court to seek an imposition of sanctions with the applicable statutory maximum penalties, which shall not be lower than the penalties specified by the CSC.In all cases, the civil fines and the

approved capital market investment consultant for two months. The sanctions took effect from July 31, 2013. In addition, the SEC disclosed inappropriate behavior of an approved securities investment