Misstatements that are material, but not pervasive, resulting from: ฆ 2.1.1 selection of an inappropriate accounting policy (paragraph ........); ฆ 2.1.2 incorrect use of accounting policy (paragraph........); ฆ
to order or act duty resulting in Beyond’s engagement in any other business which is not a licensed securities business without permission from the Capital Market Supervisory Boards approval which
to order or act resulting in Beyond’s failure to put in place sufficient and effective risk management system which violated Section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 amended by the
. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment.The case was deemed final
. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment.The case was deemed final
. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed final
SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed
SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed
the SEC Act. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was
. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2-year imprisonment. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment. The case was deemed final