and relevant to the client's investment decision. From the Stock Exchange of Thailand's securities trading inspection report on Electronics Industry Public Company Limited (EIC), the SEC further probed

had received the trading orders from the client's authorized person via mobile phone. The SEC further probed into the case and found communication record between {A} and the client's authorized person

probed into Wiroj case and found that he failed to inform the rules of volatile stock such as stock's risk and settlement duties to the client before submission of purchase order. As a result, the client

by concealing important information that might adverse affect the client's benefits. Following the report of UOB Kay Hian Securities (Thailand) Plc. and a client complaint, the SEC probed into {A} case

Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC probed into the case and found that {A} had sold 711,300 {X1} shares in a trading account of a juristic person where he is an authorized director and holds 99.98

a number of orders via mobile phone. For {B}, the SEC probed into the case and found that she failed to keep complete record of a number of a client's securities trading orders and admitted that the

Limited (ESTAR) for insider trading.With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC probed into the case and found that during February 24-28, 2014, Ratanachai had used another person?s

EMC Public Company Limited (EMC).With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC probed into the case and found that during October 16-18, 2013, Paiboon, then EMC Managing Director

volume to be inconsistent with the normal market condition, the SEC probed into the case and found that Pimpa in colluding with Nophadol had used Nophadol?s and other persons? trading accounts to trade

manipulating share price of Permsin Steel Works Plc. (PERM). With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand on irregular trading of PERM shares by a group of persons, the SEC probed into the case and