actions under the AMLO authority as the offenses are deemed unfair activities concerning the aforesaid companies’ securities trading transactions, which constitutes a predicate offense under the Anti-Money

legal action taken under the SEA to the AMLO since the offences in this case also constitute a predicate offence under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), as amended. Filing a criminal

legal action.  Concurrently, the SEC has reported the aforementioned action to the AMLO for further consideration, as the offense constitutes unfair securities trading, which is considered a predicate

all 10 offenders with the DSI for consideration of further legal actions. In this regard, since the offenses in this case also constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E

the SEA to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) because such offenses are predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and the Amendments thereto. In any case, filing

offense of unfair practice in trading securities constituted a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999).

this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities and derivatives trading practices also constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and related

securities companies. In this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities trading practices are also listed as a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), the SEC has

of predicate offenses under the Anti-Money Laundering Act to include the offense relating to unfair securities trading under the Securities and Exchange Act; comprising imparting false or misleading

designated to report various transactions and as an enforcement agency against predicate offenses in the capital market. For cases involving violations of the Securities and Exchange Act, including stock