action within its authority, as the unfair securities trading misconduct constitutes a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999).  Note

constitute a predicate offense under the Law on Anti-Money Laundering.    Following the criminal complaint filed by the SEC, the criminal enforcement process will proceed with an investigation by the inquiry

because such offenses are unfair activities related to securities trading, which constitute a predicate offense under the Law on Anti-Money Laundering.    Following the criminal complaint filed by the SEC

SEC reported this legal action to the AMLO, in connection with the criminal complaint against the 10 directors and executives of Stark, since the offences in this case also constitute a predicate

actions under the AMLO authority as the offenses are deemed unfair activities concerning the aforesaid companies’ securities trading transactions, which constitutes a predicate offense under the Anti-Money

legal action taken under the SEA to the AMLO since the offences in this case also constitute a predicate offence under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), as amended. Filing a criminal

legal action.  Concurrently, the SEC has reported the aforementioned action to the AMLO for further consideration, as the offense constitutes unfair securities trading, which is considered a predicate

all 10 offenders with the DSI for consideration of further legal actions. In this regard, since the offenses in this case also constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E

the SEA to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) because such offenses are predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and the Amendments thereto. In any case, filing

offense of unfair practice in trading securities constituted a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999).