} frequently failed to record his clients' securities trading orders as the same as {B} case as reported by his employer Phara Securities Plc. Both persons admitted that they took those orders via mobile phone

employer?s contribution to raise employee?s savings without requiring employer?s additional contribution. At present, the law prescribes that employer shall pay the contribution into the fund at the rate not

cooperation, benefits or harm, to their employer listed companies. This proposed extensive disclosure complies with the international guidelines for information disclosure.  The consultation paper is available

her employer, however, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served.  

via internet trading accounts of the clients. In case of {B}, the SEC found that he failed to record a large number of clients' securities trading orders. {B} admitted to his employer that he took those

already been suspended by her employer, however, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served.

suspended {A} for one-month from his duty as an approved capital market investment consultant. Taking into account that {A} had already been suspended by his employer for fifteen days, the suspension imposed

he has already been suspended by the employer for one year, the suspension imposed by the SEC shall remain for one additional year;(2) suspended {B} for one year and six months. As he has already been

behavior.On {A} case, her employer reported to the SEC that {A} failed to meet minimum educational requirements for her job. The SEC ' s further probe showed that she also failed to meet the SEC's requirements

for a period of two months. Taking into account that he has already been suspended by his employer for one month and fifteen days, the suspension imposed by the SEC shall  be fifteen days, effective