to the inquiry official’s investigation, the public attorney’s prosecution, and the court’s adjudication, respectively.   --------------------------------

Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have

taking advantage of others; (3) I was sentenced to imprisonment by the court’s final judgment for the commission of any of the following public offences, regardless of whether the imprisonment was

with law on protection and suppression of money laundering; (4) was convicted by the court’s final judgment on the offences relating to property committed https://www.sec.or.th/EN/Pages/LawandRegulations

The Constitutional Court has passed a unanimous ruling that the presumption of persons having known or possessed the inside information under Section 243 and Section 244 of the Securities and

commencement of the criminal proceedings, whereby the consideration of whether any person is guilty is subject to the inquiry official’s investigation, the public prosecutor’s prosecution, and the court’s

official’s investigation, the public attorney’s prosecution, and the court’s jurisdiction, respectively. SEC strongly advises persons who are interested in securities and derivatives investment and solicited

process whereby the consideration of whether the defendant is guilty is under the ECD’s investigation, the public attorney’s prosecution, and the court’s jurisdiction, respectively. Those interested in

lawsuit against Surin in the Civil, pressing for civil sanctions with the highest legal penalty. SEC has sought the Court’s ruling to require Surin to pay a civil fine, compensate the benefits received

, whereby the consideration of whether any person is guilty is subject to the inquiry official’s investigation, the public prosecutor’s prosecution, and the court’s adjudication, respectively. Taking action