issuance of POLAR-W4 and the issuance and offering of convertible debenture, and (5) allotment of 4,000 million PP capital increase shares. POLAR consequently proceeded these matters despite its unclear
ensure business continuity and prevent damage caused by deficient information security ?Currently, operating business of listed companies no longer deals with economic prosperity alone. Rather, managing
KITHA shares is classified as acquisition of significant asset and related party transaction, the shareholders? resolution alone was unable to satisfy the requirements under regulations under the
trading decision and informed the client afterward. Examination on records of investment advice, trade order instructions and confirmations indicated that the client's instruction was unclear as certain
aforementioned assets. Moreover, the backgrounds surrounding NUSA’s petition for the Court’s revocation of the share swap contract with WEH shareholders remained unclear, with anticipated potential impacts on NUSA
are various unclear matters such as management structure, the board of directors’ structure, person holding Chairman of the Board of Directors position, and impact of the dispute on the lawsuit to
from unclear sources of capital to facilitate financial transactions, business operators are allowed to offer digital tokens for returns in cryptocurrencies or accept cryptocurrencies from customers only
unless the application is denied. In any case, to prevent the use of cryptocurrencies derived from unclear sources of capital, business operators are allowed to offer digital tokens for returns in
and the PPA remain unclear and uncertain while additional investment of 7,850 million baht is needed, causing IFA unable to appraise the project value; (3) various risks associated with the transaction