February 16, 2011. After the review on the company?s third quarterly financial statements was unable to satisfy whether the advertising expense was in line with the market price and whether the service of
million, decreased by Baht 72 million or 4.0% from Q3’2017, mainly from declining in total green tea market while the company still maintained market leader position, and partly from the fire incident at
Distribution Expense 43.96 50.47 Administrative Expense 59.52 60.31 Finance Costs 20.08 27.51 Net Profit 161.28 (12.84) Earnings per share (Baht) 0.403 (0.032) The comparison between Third Quarter of 2020 and
1,820.49 Distribution Expense 63.21 50.30 Administrative Expense 59.70 73.65 Finance Costs 21.95 24.29 Net Profit 271.25 32.34 Earnings per share (Baht) 0.679 0.081 The comparison between Second Quarter of
purchase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Profit before Selling and Administration expenses 48.29 33.87 39.31 5.44 16.06 -8.98 -18.59 Selling expense 11.70 11.26 11.33 0.07 0.62 -0.37 -3.13 Administration
955.30% Gross Profit 418.34 38.05% 633.38 40.90% (215.04) (33.95%) Other Revenue 36.08 3.28% 38.79 2.50% (2.71) (6.99%) Selling Expense (175.92) (16.00%) (154.89) (10.00%) 21.03 13.58% Administrative
. Moreover, there was a high base in Q4’2017 since the market reacted to an announcement of the new excise tax imposed to RTD Tea before the regulation became effective in mid Sep’17. Although the challenging
Audit Committee Board of Directors and Audit Committee have examined together that in the past 1-2 years, the joint venture company has lost operating results. One of the reasons is high interest expense
interest expense which the interest rate is approximately 9-10 percent per year. Moreover, the management structure is not appropriate; therefore, the joint venture company has high unnecessary human
from the second quarter Ended June 30, 2016. That effected higher cost of goods sold from the fixed cost for the factories employee expense that couldn’t be used full capacity of production. หน้าที 2 จาก