changed in line with the same direction of the increased in revenue. When comparing Q2- 2022 to Q3- 2021, it found that the change rate of operating expenses is very similar to the change rate of revenue
and decreases at the same rate as the change in revenue. In terms of the profit of the Company for Q1–2021 changed in line with the change in revenue, when compare to Q4–2020 and Q1–2020. Compare to the
-q (3.27 Baht/KWh in 6M’2018 and Q2’2018) which is in line with the change in Ft – the tariff announced by ERC. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REVENUE STRUCTURE ABBREVIATION & OUR PROJECTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Q1’2018 (3.16 Baht/KWh in Q1’2017 and 3.27 Baht/KWh in Q4’2017) which is in line with the change in Ft – the tariff announced by ERC FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REVENUE STRUCTURE ABBREVIATION & OUR
0.9% q-on-q (3.28 Baht/KWh in 9M’2018 / 3.30 Baht/KWh in Q3’2018) which is in line with the change in Ft – the tariff announced by ERC. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REVENUE STRUCTURE ABBREVIATION & OUR
. 3.2. Assets, Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity Current assets are largely in line with no major change apart from a slight increase in stone inventory. Non-current assets have increased due to the
Q1-2022, resulting in the increasing rate of revenue in Q2-2022 is not very high when comparing in total revenue. Typically, the profit for the period changes in line with the change in revenue. When
THB 798.52 million and THB 765.46 million respectively or dropping slightly at a rate of 4.14%. With regard to sales by product line, almost product lines experienced declines in sales revenue compared
compared to the same period last year. Table 1: Sales Revenue by Product Line for the Three Months Period Ended 31 December (YoY) Product Line/ Business Group Consolidated financial statements Change