value to deceive any persons about financial condition and performance of the companies. The said persons were (1) {A}, GSTEL director and executive & GJS director, (2) {B}, GSTEL executive, (3) {C
? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain. This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of
wrongdoing.In addition, he committed or permitted no record of important information in the notes to RAM financial statements for the year 2012, the first and third quarters of 2013, and the year 2013 in order to
., Ltd. (Thai Niche).Earlier, the auditors gave opinions on TUCC Q2/2011 and 2011 financial statements, respectively, to TUCC audit committee in accordance with section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange
in the amount of 37.7 million baht where he misappropriated such amount of money for his own benefit. In addition, in the name of NIPPON, he had applied for a loan from a financial institution by
37.7 million baht where he misappropriated such amount of money for his own benefit. In addition, in the name of NIPPON, he had applied for a loan from a financial institution by issuing short-term bill
financial statements of NMG. The evidence in this case has revealed that the NMG’s financial statements for the year 2015 to 2017 showed manipulated income and unrealized advertising income, which were in
Ratchasak and related persons with the DSI for falsifying a 10.5 million baht revenue in POWER?s financial statements for the year 2004 used for showing company profit with the request to be removed from the
known that the company would be unable to fulfil the sub-contract terms due to the cancellation of the power plant project. Their actions resulted in financial damage to IEC at the total amount of 156.8
) Mrs. Sasinapa Waraporn. These persons who are connected through personal relationships, financial transactions, securities trading, as well as the channels and locations used for placing orders, divided