) shares by trading such shares continuously in concealment through several trading accounts to the point where the normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013. The court of
trading such shares continuously in concealment through several trading accounts to the point where the normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013. The court of first
shares continuously in concealment through several trading accounts to the point where the normal market condition became affected during 10 - 27 September 2013. The Appeal Court dismissed the case. This
market condition. that was inconsistent with the normal market conditions. Furthermore, these transactions misled other persons to into thinking that these securities were traded in significant volume and
trading order or trading securities on a continued basis causing the price and the volume of DPAINT stocks to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. that was inconsistent with the normal market
order or trading securities on a continued basis causing the price and the volume of DPAINT stocks to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. that was inconsistent with the normal market
securities trading order or trading securities on a continued basis causing the price and the volume of DPAINT stocks to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. that was inconsistent with the normal