against {X1} Company Limited and strictly instructed the company to improve its compliance with the oversight regulations.The company's offense was liable to violation of Section 113 of the Securities and

falsification and false accounting record in violation of Sections 281/2, 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Wichai was sentenced to serve 20-year imprisonment and

Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 ("SEA") with the following offences:1) For their responsibility over PICNI operations in 2004 when they jointly made changes to the contracts to let

Intermediaries _____________________________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008

No. INGRS036 13 December 2019 Subject : Explanation on 3-months and 9-months financial performance of INGRS for the period ended 31 October 2019 To : The President The Stock Exchange of Thailand

of Section 14 and Section 98(5) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), the Securities https://publish.sec.or.th/nrs/2544pe_r.pdf FS_PAGE_1220_E_2017-12-08_7330880354.pdf publicly

Section 98(5) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), the Securities https://publish.sec.or.th/nrs/2544pe_r.pdf FS_PAGE_1220_E_2017-12-08_7330880354.pdf publicly disclosed through the SET’s

Section 58 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the SEC has instructed NUSA to clarify the following matters:   1. The action plan for NUSA to support liquidity or the ability to repay

and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be.  The said actions also caused damages to the company but

cases, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the