of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn

approval from the SEC was in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Criminal Fining Committee therefore has

Division of the Royal Thai Police (ECD) for jointly operating the digital asset dealer business without license in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency

the SEC website, in order for the SEC to conduct further in-dept investigations. Any activities liable to violation of laws enforced by the SEC may be subject to legal action, which could result in both

were in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*. The SEC, therefore, suspended Acting Subbieutant Saroj from his duty as the

on {B} and {C}, respectively, for collusively trading TWZ shares with the intention to induce the general public into buying or selling such shares in violation of Sections 243 (2) of the SEA and

which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under

failure to perform duties with responsibility and due care as the capital market professional were in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital

made by clients were in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended Napat from his duty as the approved

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor