> SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section 242(1) in conjunction with section 244 (2) and (5) Civil Action Dated 08/08/2025

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1

deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 244(5), while the action of Satida was deemed a contravention of Section 315 in conjunction with Section 242(1), and the action of

. (FOCUS) share price during April 24-25, 2008. His offense is in violation of Section 243 (1), Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 in conjunction with Section 86 of the

. Such activities were in violation of Section 244/3 (1) and (2), the presumption under Section 244/5 and Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with

. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

other persons regarding the prices or trading volumes of the securities, liable to be offenses under Section 244/3(1) in conjunction with Section 244/5(2)(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

issued under Section 58 (1), which is liable to the offenses under Section 274 and Section 281/10 in conjunction with Section 58 (1) of the SEA, and the case where EARTH disclosed misleading statements

(1), in conjunction with Section 243(1), subject to penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The actions of Mrs. Phanida, Miss Thitirat

Section 243(1) in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code, while {F} {G} {H} {I} and {J} violated