granted, violating Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 03/07/2015
, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.90
of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon’s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public Companies Act of 1992, which do not give chairman of
SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.90