channels, but still growing in term of original equipment manufacturer (OEMs)’s products to compensate. For the overseas restaurant business, revenues from the sales and services decreased from the same
Bangkok, March 16, 2016 ? The Criminal Fining Committee has imposed a fine of 500,000 baht on Chai Sophonpanich for disclosing inside information for other persons to purchase shares of Bangkok
asset business without obtaining a license. The Court, therefore, sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for a term of 2 years and a fine of 200,000 Baht. Given that the Defendant pleaded guilty, which
Foods Public Company Limited (TIPCO) using inside information known or in possession. The two offenders are required to pay a total fine of 4,970,880 baht and are prohibited from serving as directors
Bangkok, 13 December 2016 ? The Criminal Fining Committee has imposed a separate, equal fine, totaling at 5,917,125 baht, on five joint principals in the manipulation of the Yong Thai Public Company
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a fine on him in the amount of 48,127,389.54 baht. As aider and abettor, Pathaipoom and Chalalai were deemed to
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both
PLC (CWT) by allowing the use of his trading account. On March 14, 2011, the Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 600,000 for violating Sections 243(1), (2), 244(2), (3) and 296 of
shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. He entered the settlement process but failed to pay the fine as ordered by Settlement Committee. The public