department recorded such fake entries as income and accrued income in the total of 691 million baht. This case is under consideration by the court of first instance. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 2 in
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In
to the EGM. Mr. Sakesan shall be liable for the penalties under section 281/2 of the SEC Act. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 1 in
Mr. Worawat have jointly operated a digital asset dealer without a license. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. DAB Act S.26 and Section 83 of Penal Code Criminal Complaint
) Asia Pacific Drilling Engineering Company Limited. This case is under consideration by the court of first instance. SEC Act S.312 281/2 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 89/7 and 89/7 in conjunction