? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain. This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of
volume to be inconsistent with the normal market condition, the SEC probed into the case and found that Pimpa in colluding with Nophadol had used Nophadol?s and other persons? trading accounts to trade
into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the
statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307