result. Dear sir, We, Unimit Engineering Public Company Limited (UEC) , would like to clarify the change in operating result for Q2/2019 which changing over 20% from the same period last year as follows

issuer’s proposal to the JTS254A bondholders’ meeting to adjust the bond repayment terms, which involves a deferral or change in the debt repayment schedule. For the JTS254A bond, the company stated in the

: Million Baht) 3 Months Change % Change 2 / 5 Operating results by business for the three-month period ended 30 June 2020 • Increase in gross profit was mainly derived from the following reasons: 1

case-by-case basis, by the Office, with the primary businesses in line with the primary business in which the mutual fund intends to invest, as specified in the investment policy; “Client” means person

-case basis, by the Office, with the primary businesses in line with the primary business in which the mutual fund intends to invest, as specified in the investment policy; “Client” means person or a

trading to the client. She also had the trader's name card made under the company's name and position of marketing officer, misleading the client to believe that such trader was an SEC approved investor

 {A} had solicited a client to invest in derivatives products by guaranteeing returns; the client agreed to the deal and allowed him to make investment decisions on the client's behalf. Later, he was

negligent with regard to supervision of the company?s core work systems.   Regarding the share transfer case, Auracha, then an investment consultant at AEC, was found transfering shares in the client?s

the client mutual fund investment advice describing that the principal would not be affected. The said advice was given, even though the client made investment in a mixed fund having medium to high risk

investment consultants above work for the KASIKORNBANK Public Company Limited (KBANK).In the cases of (1) and (2), {A} affixed her signature as the investment consultant for a person who was not her client