from an investor who is not a client of RHB and the SEC’s further investigation into the case, it was found that during June 2020 – May 2022, Phisit had solicited investors to open securities trading

will consider further action regarding the matter.In the case of Chanthani, on 10 April 2014 she had access to the insider information regarding the proposal for business acquisition by virtue of her

distinct and different offences. The defendants were convicted according to Section 91 of the Penal Code. As defendants had made confession, which was beneficial to the case, the Court commuted the

sanctions.   In any case, filing a criminal complaint commences the criminal justice administration whereby the consideration whether a defendant is guilty will be proceeded by the inquiry official and the

of both companies have not yet transferred the shares to the company. SCAN could be exposed to risk of not getting money back if the agreements are terminated. IFA also indicated that in case of

shares from January 9, 2006 to January 25, 2007, the SEC probed into the case and found that Pattanapong had traded ASCON shares through trading accounts of five other persons in the manner that boosting

remain sufficient for the first investment scenario. In case WAVE intends to increase its holding up to, after the capital increase, 25 percent of its registered capital, WAVE will have to spend large

company?s documents, reports and accounts. His actions were therefore also deemed in contravention of Section 312 of the SEA. In this case, the SEC also found that the company secretary at that time

documents, reports and accounts. His actions were therefore also deemed in contravention of Section 312 of the SEA. In this case, the SEC also found that the company secretary at that time responsible for

Public Company Limited, (3) Globlex Securities Company Limited, (4) Maybank Kim Eng Securities (Thailand) Public Company Limited, and (5) AEC Securities Public Company Limited. In the case of the other