placing a securities trading order or trading securities on a continued basis causing the price and the volume of PTC stocks to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. that was inconsistent with

Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification of the Capital Market Board, due to his failure to order or act in accordance with duties required to be performed. This case is in the

to order or act in accordance with duties required to be performed. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with 56(2)(3)(4) Criminal Complaint

period. His order or action resulted in Bitazza’s offence regarding the digital asset dealer without a license owing to providing a service known as "Crypto Dust" and joint providing the product

relevant period. His order or action resulted in IBS Intensive's offence regarding the digital asset fund manager without a license owing to, during 17 November 2021 – 3 May 2022, providing services or

financial statements for Q1/2018 to the SEC Office and the Stock Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, the juristic person representative has evaded the arrest and has been pursued

and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the

(2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to