QoQ comparison showed a 56% drop as that of 4Q17 incorporated profit of a non-recurring income from the recognition of the upfront lease payment of Singha Complex, as mentioned previously. Profit margin
reason was the lower average selling price due to fewer big projects & price competition while the prices of plastic raisin rose, and then caused lower gross profit margin. WIIK
(Day) 32.5 33.9 Profitability Ratio Gross Profit Margin (%) 8.0 15.0 Operating Profit Margin (%) 2.0 8.7 EBITDAR Margin (%) 13.2 18.9 Net profit Margin (%) (0.6) 3.2 Return on Equity (%) (0.5) 3.0
energy projects. In 2019, SAAM Group’s gross profit amounted to THB 52.78 million, representing gross profit margin of 73.50%, a THB 1.85 million or 3.62% increase from the previous year (in 2018: THB
2019 to Baht 11,485 million and 33.4% y-on-y in Q4’2019 to Baht 2,938 million due to portfolio expansion through project COD and the acquisition as mentioned. • EBITDA margin increased to 26.0% in 2019
). The growth in cost of services was in line with the growth in revenue. As the end of 2019, we have slightly improved the gross margin from 45.4% to 45.9%. Gross Profit As a result of overall
decrease in rental space from the closed down IT Junction Branches. Resulting in gross profit was equal to 169.5 million Baht, increasing by 8.5% percent, representing a gross margin at 18.2% from total
increasing service costs Gross profit margin for the year For the year ending December 3 1 ,2 0 1 9 was 15 . 8 6% and for the year ended December 31 ,2018 was 20.60% , decreased from the previous year because
ต้นทุนค่าใบอนุญาตและ การขยายโครงขา่ย 4G คงประมาณการปี 2560 (ตามรายละเอยีดในหน้า 7) ในครึง่ปีแรกของปี 2560 รายไดจ้ากการใหบ้รกิารเตบิโต 5.3% และอตัรา EBITDA margin อยู่ที ่44.2% สอดคลอ้งกบัคาดการณ์ทัง้ปี โดย
Ratio Gross Profit Margin (%) 12.9 27.5 Operating Profit Margin (%) 5.7 21.0 EBITDAR Margin (%) 18.4 30.2 Net profit Margin (%) 0.3 10.6 Return on Equity (%) 0.3 9.1 Efficiency Ratio Return on Assets