considered in contravention of the second paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307 and 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with Sections 83 and 86 of the
of Directors pursuant to Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).KC must submit the amended financial statements, the Forms, and the results of the special audit to the SEC by
to have sufficient period of time to study relevant information prior to the meeting date. To comply with such good practice, under Section 89/28 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As they declined to enter the settlement
case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were
unlawful gains for the benefit of herself and others, in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Phra Suthep Arpassaro (Panpai) and Vachala Pisitsak were also
) for falsifying the company?s documents and accounts in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The SEC?s finding indicated that Somchit proceeded or permitted
institutional investor under Section 3 and the Notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning Additional Determination of Type of Juristic Person Classified as Institutional Investors . Chapter
investor under Section 3 and the Notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning Additional Determination of Type of Juristic Person Classified as Institutional Investors. Chapter 1