addition, due to the fact that Amorn, Pipat and Nasika held the position of director and/or executive of AJD at the time of committing offenses and were imposed with a civil penalty by the Civil

application rejection this time does not invalidate their right to apply for a digital asset business licence in the future as long as the application criteria are met.The application for a digital asset

exploitation of third parties and liable to the offences under Section 241 and the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), which were in force at the time of

. 2535 (1992) (SEA), which were in force at the time of offence commission. In addition, such act is currently deemed an offence under Section 242 and subject to the punishments under Section 296 and

punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which were in force at the time of committing the offences. In addition, such offences are currently in violation of Section

the contribution into the fund later than the period specified by the law, and revising the processing time periods for the fund’s various proceedings and penalties in the PVD Act.The consultation paper

time. 

percent voting rights of the total sold shares.   In this regard, IFA has an opinion that the SUSCO shareholders should not approve the proposed transaction this time due to inadequate conditions in the

net capital. This shall provide a period of time for the business operator to take corrective actions to ensure that the subordinated liabilities portion not considered as total liabilities does not

accounts to seek benefits for himself and the others, a misconduct of client asset exploitation. At the time of his wrongdoing, he was employed by RHB Securities (Thailand) PLC (RHB).Following a complaint