People’s Republic of China and Thailand ______________ By virtue of Section 72 and Section 81 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby

undertaking of securities business without having obtained a license under Section 90 and subject to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange act B.E. 2535 (1992), namely an imprisonment

director and CEO of Zipmex Thailand at the time, acted in a manner liable to be an offense under Section 82 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). Furthermore, the fact that

benefiting himself or others through such misconduct. This is a violation under Section 89/7, with penalties stipulated in Section 281/2, Paragraph 1, of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), and

regarding the effectiveness of their legal acts while digital asset business operators may be exposed to a risk regarding the legality of the executed legal acts. For example, Section 21 prescribes that a

failure to comply with, Section 26 and is liable to criminal sanction under Section 66 of the Digital Asset Businesses Emergency Decree, i.e., imprisonment for a term of two to five years and a fine of

According to the first paragraph of Section 23 of Provident Fund Act, when an employee’s membership terminates on a cause other than the dissolution of the fund, the fund manager shall make

major shareholder, sold the shares in his personal trading account during 3-26 October 2012 at the total amount of 576,000 shares. The misconducts of the four offenders violated Section 241 and liable to

which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under

report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated