during the years 2021–2022. Such information disclosure could mislead investors about the actual trading volumes or prices.The acts of Zipmex described above could constitute an offense related to the
subsidiaries. Both acts led to the three individuals gaining benefits at the total amount of 3,465.64 million baht. The acts of the three individuals above constituted offences under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2
, for failing to take action for the company?s utmost benefit or for the Board of Directors to have sufficient information before ratifying the above investments in Plus and Plus-W2. The criminal
the Anti-Money Laundering Act (No. 4) B.E. 2556 (2013) and the Counter-Terrorism Financing Act B.E. 2556 (2013).The promulgation of the above Acts demonstrates significant progress in meeting
director of the company purchasing the NUSA condominium units, assisted persons under (1) – (4) in committing the offenses. The SEC’s findings revealed that the deposit for the purchase of the hotel above