17/08/2023 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First Instance considerationThe case that appears in the details
under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act
to believe that Mr. Suphan Sethapanich has obtained benefits from selling the bills of exchange (B/E). He, therefore, committed an offense under the second paragraph of Section 281/2 and Section 311 of
1,139.5 1,182.8 1,148.4 (34.4) (2.9%) 4,540.2 4,586.4 46.2 1.0% Revenue from finance lease under power purchase agreement 100.9 102.8 103.2 94.3 (8.9) (8.6%) 410.4 401.2 (9.2) (2.2%) Revenue from
such error resulting in the incorrect unit price under paragraph one hereof consequently affects the following calculation of unit price, e.g., resulting in error in the determination of interest rate
resulting in the incorrect unit price under paragraph one hereof consequently affects the following calculation of unit price, e.g., resulting in error in the determination of interest rate, etc., the
No. 9 (B.E. 2540) issued under the Securities and Exchange Act, B.E. 2535 (1992), the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby issues the following regulations: Clause 1. In this Notification: “Short
Procedures for Securities Borrowing and Lending By virtue of Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act, B.E. 2535 (1992) and Clause 5 of the Ministerial Regulation No. 9 (B.E. 2540) issued under the
Ministerial Regulation No. 9 (B.E. 2540) issued under the Securities and Exchange Act, B.E. 2535 (1992), the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby issues the following regulations: Clause 1. In this