rules. Bee was earlier found purchasing EIC shares through the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) at a price higher than the tender offer price. His action resulted in a violation of the tender offer rules
action by placing trading orders through other persons? trading accounts and making payment for such transactions.Swake?s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
CMO shares acquired during the latter period.The aforesaid actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the Settlement Committee therefore imposed
capital market professional, in violation of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market.* The SEC therefore suspended her from duty as the approved
licensed to operate securities business in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions are in violation of Section 90 and liable to the penalties under Section 289, i.e
offences committed by Bordin and Noparat were liable to violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and Section 83
securities business pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. His action was in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years
had not been sufficient. This caused the client about 3,000,000 Baht in damage. In this regard, the aforesaid actions are in violation of Clause 20(1) and (2) of the Notification of Capital Market
shares through such provided account, and obtained profit sharing according to the proportion invested among three of them.Choavalit?s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange
securities trading decisions on behalf of client was in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended Atthapol from