into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
orders and payment. The said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee
said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on {A
down the business or delist SPSU shares from the SET. Later, SPI launched a tender offer to purchase SPSU shares at the price higher than the market price during such period. The said actions were in
million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to IFEC as well as made false
million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to IFEC as well as made false
with the amount of 155 million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to
million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to IFEC as well as made false
million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to IFEC as well as made false
. In addition, ACAP recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself