sold SUPER shares in his own and other persons? trading accounts to gain personal benefits.Securities trading based on non-public information that is material to the change in securities price is deemed

, for the benefit of his own or others, also transferred the client?s deposits placed with the company to the accounts of other clients that he was allowed to use. Chalerm?s actions were deemed dishonesty

error port without  record and evidence of clients? trading orders. Meaunchit admitted that a number of  clients had contacted her through mobile. Meaunchit?s actions were deemed trading securities for

allocation to seek personal gains for oneself or other persons. By committing such act which gained him more than 42 million baht in benefits, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In

. By committing such act which gained him more than 42 million baht in benefits, {A} was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In addition to him, {B} and {C} were also involved in the act as

deemed as having untrustworthy characteristics of a publicly held company's director and executive while {B} and {C} are deemed as having prohibited characteristics of capital market personnel and

also received benefits from other relevant acts. His action  was deemed a violation of Section 89/7 and subject to penalties prescribed in the second paragraph of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 311

deemed a failure to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and

internet banking system to transfer 2,000 baht from a client's account into his own without the client's authorization. {D}'s actions were deemed to be prohibited characteristics of investor contacts in

substitution holidays later when deemed appropriate. By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Paragraph 1 of Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory