criminal fining process. The SEC, therefore, filed the criminal complaint with the ECD Police for further legal proceedings. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.246
. Tharakorn Junkerd, (6) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final
) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7
incident, was responsible for the operation of Merkle. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Merkle concerning the case that, between November 25, 2024
Company Limited (“BAY”). Being the person responsible for BAY’s operations, she failed to issue orders or omitted to perform her duties as required. This pertains to the case where BAY, acting as the
collection or any other compensation to be collected from the securities issuer. Clause 5/1 ( In the case where the Office has considered that the applicant for a license under Clause 3 has the accurate and
issuer. Clause 5/1 In the case where the Office has considered that the applicant for a license under Clause 3 has the accurate and complete qualifcations as specified, the Office shall propose the case
application for approval for derivatives trading according to Clause 7 within thirty days as from the date on which the Office receives the complete application and supplementary documents. Clause 9. In case
application and supplementary documents. Clause 9. In case the derivatives broker is a securities company which has obtained an approval from the Office to make a derivatives trading for their own account