income tax expenses 15.09 73.01 (57.92) (79.33%) Income tax expenses (revenues) (0.04) 0.28 (0.32) (114.29%) Profit for the year 15.13 72.74 (57.61) (79.20%) Gross profit margin 49.67% 63.46% (13.79%) Net
% Financial expense (0.54) (0.61) (0.42) -22.22% -31.15% (1.76) (1.53) -13.07% Profit before income tax expense 70.74 14.15 40.93 -42.14% 189.26% 166.60 126.03 -24.35% Income tax expense (3.20) (0.24) 0.53
by 3.0 MB, and increase in non-current assets, PPE , intangible asset, and total of deferred income tax assets and other non-current assets by 27.8 MB, 0.1 MB and 0.5 MB respectively. Liabilities As
from higher deferred spectrum interest after acquisition of 700MHz in Apr-21. Income tax was Bt1,571mn, increasing 6.4% QoQ following an increase in profit before tax, and increasing 11%YoY due to the
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) Codified up to No. 10 As of 28 February 2020 Readers should be aware that only the original Thai text has legal force and that this English translation is strictly for reference. Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. Tor Jor. 3/2558 Re: Provisions relating to Offer for Sale of Shares Issued by Foreign Company Whose Shares Are Not Traded on Foreign Exchange _______________ By virtue of Sections 16/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as...
agreements. 3 Link Capital I and ACO I are private limited companies set up as special purpose vehicles for investments by SSG III. The SSG Group has decided to have Link Capital I make investments as a
Anunrojwong, (13) Miss Kittika Wisarootanart and (14) Mr. Thana Seentanaphatr. The investigation also revealed that these offenders had business connection or personal relationship, either directly or through
Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019). The TIA will continue to render assistance in further operation and facilitation in case the proceeding of class action lawsuit is requested.” For more
the true owner of the trading account, and adding a new contact phone number to the client's personal profile even though there was no evidence that the client had ordered the responsible investment
office to confirm the share transfer with a person who was believed not to be the true owner of the trading account, and adding a new contact phone number to the client?s personal profile even though there