{A} had solicited a client to invest in derivatives products by guaranteeing returns; the client agreed to the deal and allowed him to make investment decisions on the client's behalf. Later, he was

offenders have agreed to the civil sanctions imposed by the Civil Sanction Committee; Surachai has paid a fine of 1,635,871.25 baht while Orthai, Somsak and Phichayada have paid a separate fine of 500,000

have shared and discussed relevant guidelines and preventive measures such as industry engagement and guidelines of good practices. The meeting further agreed that the APRC members should conduct a

, jeopardizing its listed company status and trading of company shares in the future.  Although, ADAM board of directors agreed with IFA?s opinion, the board was of the view that it is shareholders? right to make

under Section 296 of the said Act. As he agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee ordered him to pay a fine of 500,000 baht.?

and Chinese delegates agreed to regularly hold executives? meeting to continue exploring the idea and move forward for more concrete collaboration in the future.  

Code.As they all agreed to enter into the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee imposed a fine of 500,000 baht on {A} {B} and {C} each; and a fine of 333,333.33 baht on {D} and {E} each.     

of {B} {C} and {D} were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code.As they all agreed to enter the settlement

(1992) (SEA); while Usavadee and Perayuth?s actions, as aider and abettor, were in violation of Section 241 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code.As the three persons agreed to enter

probed into the case and found that during March 18 ? October 9, 2008, Sornnon, Naraporn, Nacharat and Thanatdej (or Jiraphoj) together with other 10 persons (one person died) colluded or agreed to trade