rejection, Cash2coin and SEADEX, which had been operating business by virtue of the Transitional Provisions of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018), have become subject to

offence commission. In addition, such act is currently deemed an offence under Section 242 and subject to the punishments under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the SEA, as amended by the Securities and

. 2535 (1992) (SEA), which were in force at the time of offence commission. In addition, such act is currently deemed an offence under Section 242 and subject to the punishments under Section 296 and

. Iryne Tangpoolcharoen, (7) Mrs. Saliga Tangpoolcharoen. The offenders were subject to civil penalties at the total aggregate amount of 120 million baht and a ban from holding the director or executive

provisions in the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (1992) are contentious and subject to different interpretations. Today’s decision by the Business Development Department, which oversees the

of the opinion that, subject to the contract, EARTH, as the contracting party, was not required to be responsible for the debt in relation to the special circumstance damages.  Furthermore, EARTH had

Laksana and Sommart in this case is deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code which is subject to

classified as a sizable related party transaction where major shareholder of CYBER-APU is the same person. The proposal is therefore subject to the approval of shareholders? meeting.  The CYBER Board of

, Kodchaphon, Chukiat and Prabpol were fined at 56,261,554.95 baht each, while Prasian, Somchai, Sirikorn, and Somchit were subject to a separate fine of 37,507,703.30 baht each.  In addition, Chalaem is banned

subject to the number of counts of offences committed by each defendant. - Under Section 91(2) of the Penal Code, if it appears that any offender has committed the several distinct and different offences