manipulation is in violation of Sections 243 (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed the separate fines of 16,071,788.32 baht and 4,563,791.25
imposed fines on another principal and aiders or abettors of the RICH price manipulation scheme.The action of {A}, one of the principals in the RICH price manipulation scheme, was in violation of Sections
violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The above persons, named in the criminal complaint filed by the SEC, are deemed as having untrustworthy
on insider trading and market manipulation offenders under Sections 241 and 243 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The bounty and gratuity will be paid in the amount up to 30% of the
? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain. This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of
deemed as share price manipulation in contravention of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the