Earlier, the Civil Sanction Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions on Mr. Suphanan, an IFEC director and chief executive officer, and Mr. Thanawat Chansuwan, who was IFEC

derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of  an imprisonment up to

Exchange Act, which was a result of a failure to order or act of POLAR's directors, namely: Mr. Yanakorn Warakunrak and Mr. Poonsak Chumchuay. Therefore, Mr. Yanakorn was liable to the civil sanctions

Exchange Act, which was a result of a failure to order or act of POLAR's directors, namely: Mr. Yanakorn Warakunrak and Mr. Poonsak Chumchuay. Therefore, Mr. Poonsak was liable to the civil sanctions

judgment amending the Civil Court judgment. The Appeal Court imposed civil sanctions as follows: the payment of a sum of 24,538,815 Baht together with 7.5% per annum interest calculated from such amount

Regulator which has the authority to impose sanctions or to order the Qualifying CIS Operator to act or refrain from acting in case there is an action which may cause damages to the interest of the investors

: 1. I/We am/are under supervision of Home Regulator which has the authority to impose sanctions or to order the Qualifying CIS Operator to act or refrain from acting in case there is an action which

securities issuance and offering, responsibilities of listed companies and executives, fraud cases related to listed companies, unfair trading activities, and the implementation of civil sanctions. He also

Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee decided to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Surin Banyongponglert in the case where he had sent trading orders of PICO shares in the manner of price manipulation

which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine of