material to {X1} Company share price. The purchases were made through trading accounts of his son in which Sumit was an authorized person. In late 2012, {A} learned of the information concerning {X1} Company

order form (Form F8) despite the fact that those trading orders were made via mobile phone. Use of Form F8 therefore was inappropriate submission of trading orders because such Form must be used in

made available, including articles as well as local and international developments in such areas while ?AC Corner? has been set up as a communication channel with audit committees. Furthermore, the

date of information amendment to allow investors sufficient time to digest the information and review their investment decision. Investors already made subscription, if change their decision after

securities trading decisions on behalf of the client. She then continuously made trading decision on behalf of the client for more than three months in high value and volume trades. {A}'s action was deemed as

securities trading account of another person for her own or others? benefits in such a way that taking advantage of others. The selling was made by using material non-public information concerning a 129.83

clients are able to bring a dispute into the arbitration procedures when they do not agree with complaint handling process made by securities and derivatives companies. The revision also includes abolishing

trading room.  He failed to keep all clients' trading orders and some trading orders were made after the trades were executed.  In addition, {A} has already been suspended by Hua Seng Heng Gold Futures Co

intimates for their own benefits. The purchases were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to RPC share price. The information, of which they learnt as

were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to {X1} Company share price. The information, of which they learnt as {X1} Company directors, was about