, assisted and supported the execution of such trading transactions. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with 315 Criminal Complaint

million baht, which created an unlawful benefit for Mr. Bhusana. Miss Ploykaew, Miss Kornrawan Sunprasert and Mr. Nanthawat Bhudithaiyarasak, who were ESES director, assisted and supported the execution of

Company Limited (ESES) director, assisted and supported the execution of such trading transactions. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 in

debtors as GL’s income on those financial statements and financial reports but the fact that the transactions are an execution of asset misappropriation by GL’S former Chief Executive Officer. Therefore

of 100,000 Baht. In the event that the defendant failed to pay the said fine, execution shall be carried out in accordance with Section 29 of the Criminal Code. DAB Act S.17 Criminal Complaint Filed

of 100,000 Baht. In the event that the defendant failed to pay the said fine, execution shall be carried out in accordance with Section 29 of the Criminal Code. DAB Act S.26 Criminal Complaint Filed

contained in this document has been obtained from several sources, and Bangkok Commercial Asset Management Public Company Limited (“BAM”) cannot confirm, in all cases, the accuracy and completeness of such

prohibited under section 126(1) and section 139(5), as the case may be; (1) Management company obtained the soft commission from any person for its own account, deriving from the service offered by such person

which prohibited under section 126(1) and section 139(5), as the case may be; (1) Management company obtained the soft commission from any person for its own account, deriving from the service offered by

case may be; (1) Management company obtained the soft commission from any person for its own account, deriving from the service offered by such person concerning the management of fund; (2) Management