Laksana and Sommart in this case is deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code which is subject to

classified as a sizable related party transaction where major shareholder of CYBER-APU is the same person. The proposal is therefore subject to the approval of shareholders? meeting.  The CYBER Board of

, Kodchaphon, Chukiat and Prabpol were fined at 56,261,554.95 baht each, while Prasian, Somchai, Sirikorn, and Somchit were subject to a separate fine of 37,507,703.30 baht each.  In addition, Chalaem is banned

subject to the number of counts of offences committed by each defendant. - Under Section 91(2) of the Penal Code, if it appears that any offender has committed the several distinct and different offences

environment without being subject to the existing regulations.  

transaction due to the fact that DEMCO?s director also serves as a director of Aeolus?s major shareholder. DEMCO is accordingly subject to mandatory disclosure of the transaction to the Stock Exchange of

due to the fact that DEMCO?s director also serves as a director of Aeolus?s major shareholder. DEMCO is accordingly subject to mandatory disclosure of the transaction to the Stock Exchange of Thailand

baht.In addition, as Pathaipoom and Chalalai are also capital market personnel, their involvements with the aforesaid share manipulation are subject to SEC?s consideration.(2)  KC price manipulation

, 2011) and the SEC also notified relevant persons to observe the said court order.In any case, filing a criminal complaint commences criminal justice administration whereby any person subject to the

notified relevant persons to observe the said court order.In any case, filing a criminal complaint commences criminal justice administration whereby any person subject to the complaint is entitled to defend