inconsistent with the normal market condition. 25/03/2026 filed a lawsuit to a civil court11/03/2025 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under
with the normal market condition. 25/03/2026 filed a lawsuit to a civil court11/03/2025 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the
market condition. 25/03/2026 filed a lawsuit to a civil court11/03/2025 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First
damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not
damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not
incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice
incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice
-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned
with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating
damage to IFEC. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.307 311 313 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an