benefiting himself or others through such misconduct. This is a violation under Section 89/7, with penalties stipulated in Section 281/2, Paragraph 1, of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), and

regarding the effectiveness of their legal acts while digital asset business operators may be exposed to a risk regarding the legality of the executed legal acts. For example, Section 21 prescribes that a

failure to comply with, Section 26 and is liable to criminal sanction under Section 66 of the Digital Asset Businesses Emergency Decree, i.e., imprisonment for a term of two to five years and a fine of

Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 281/2 of the same act. For further legal proceedings, the SEC has ordered Mr. Suphanan to make clarification in this matter by 21 July. With regards to the

According to the first paragraph of Section 23 of Provident Fund Act, when an employee’s membership terminates on a cause other than the dissolution of the fund, the fund manager shall make

taking an unfair advantage of other persons in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992.In this case, the offender refused to enter

major shareholder, sold the shares in his personal trading account during 3-26 October 2012 at the total amount of 576,000 shares. The misconducts of the four offenders violated Section 241 and liable to

Department of Special Investigation (DSI) for further legal proceedings.Their actions were in contravention of the first paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 of the Securities and

the board of directors of listed companies is obligated to perform duties with care, responsibility and honesty in accordance with Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act, the SEC, by virtue of

conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code.  Also named in the complaint were Nongluck Sinprasertlert, investor contact (marketing officer) at Kim Eng Securities (Thailand) Public Company Limited, who was