containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
penalty under Section 300 in conjunction with Section 278 and Section 302/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (the “Securities and Exchange Act”). This case is in the process of inquiry by the
Exchange Commission Re: Determination of Other Regulations of Associations related to Securities Business ____________________ By virtue of Section 14 and Section 234(7) of the Securities and Exchange Act
business operators which may be considered an act of co-principals or accomplices of the offenses.The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a warning about the provision of services that may
the Securities and Exchange Act. In addition, He failed to order or act his duty resulting in Solaris Asset Management Co., Ltd. violation of section 117 of the Securities and Exchange Act. Solaris
Address fb sec.or.th Laws/Regulations Laws / Regulations Search Acts/Royal Enactments Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives Act Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses Provident Fund Act Emergency