evening.His action was deemed using inside information to take advantage of the others in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and thus liable to the penalty

misappropriating the company?s assets in contravention of Section 307, 308, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA).     A referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the SEC

or registration from the SEC, which is a violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16. The said violation is subject to sanctions under Section 125 of an imprisonment up to three years

accounts.   The acts of {A} {B} and {C} were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the

. The act of {A} was in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The acts

loss. Their actions were in violation of Section 241, subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). On June 18, 2014, Yongyuth and Vorapin agreed to enter

violating the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).On February 21, 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand sentenced Kanchana to a five-year imprisonment for violating Section 315 in conjunction

were all sold out during low price period.  The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code

mislead other persons was in violation of Section 238 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was imposed a criminal fine of 500,000 baht.

licensed to operate securities business in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions are in violation of Section 90 and liable to the penalties under Section 289, i.e