in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in
POWER-P Plc. (POWER), for violating Sections 307, 311 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) by collusively falsifying POWER accounts worth totaling 34 million baht with
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed company, Chupong has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to
aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed
report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated
Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in December 2014, it was after the SEC's probe had revealed such
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate fraud in accordance with Section 90 of the Penal Code. In addition, he was also sentenced to serve 8-year
budget from cash flow in our business process and those Loan from Financial institution. 9. Opinion of the Board of Directors and Audit committee All directors and Audit committee is totally agree that