prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was final. SEC Act S.Section 89/7 in conjunction with section 281/2 paragraph 2 307 311 312 313 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated
for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities
criminal fining process. The SEC, therefore, filed the criminal complaint with the ECD Police for further legal proceedings. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.246
three offenders refused to enter the criminal fining process. The SEC, therefore, filed the criminal complaint with the ECD Police for further legal proceedings. This case is under consideration of the
. Tharakorn Junkerd, (6) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final
) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7
incident, was responsible for the operation of Merkle. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Merkle concerning the case that, between November 25, 2024
Company Limited (“BAY”). Being the person responsible for BAY’s operations, she failed to issue orders or omitted to perform her duties as required. This pertains to the case where BAY, acting as the