Exchange Act, which was a result of a failure to order or act of POLAR's directors, namely: Mr. Yanakorn Warakunrak and Mr. Poonsak Chumchuay. Therefore, Mr. Poonsak was liable to the civil sanctions

judgment amending the Civil Court judgment. The Appeal Court imposed civil sanctions as follows: the payment of a sum of 24,538,815 Baht together with 7.5% per annum interest calculated from such amount

securities issuance and offering, responsibilities of listed companies and executives, fraud cases related to listed companies, unfair trading activities, and the implementation of civil sanctions. He also

Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee decided to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Surin Banyongponglert in the case where he had sent trading orders of PICO shares in the manner of price manipulation

which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine of

the aforementioned information learnt from her position of TUCC chief finance officer. Yongyuth and Vorapin?s actions were in violation of Section 241 which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of

14, 2012.  The sanctions followed the SEC findings that the said persons mismanaged T.U. Dome Residential Complex Property Fund (T.U. Dome) severely, causing substantial damage to the fund and the

     - a reimbursement of investigative expenses in an amount of 35,361.00 Baht 06/05/2568 agreed to comply with civil sanctions determined by the Civil Sanction

public offering of securities without the effective registration statement and the draft prospectus from the SEC Office in violation of Section 65 and subject to sanctions under Section 276 of the

or registration from the SEC, which is a violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16. The said violation is subject to sanctions under Section 125 of an imprisonment up to three years